Chapter
Neth, H. (2020). Data Science for Psychologists. Social Psychology and Decision Sciences, University of Konstanz, Germany. Textbook and R package ds4psy (version 0.2.1, May 6, 2020). eBook available at https://bookdown.org/hneth/ds4psy/; R package at https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=ds4psy
Gaissmaier, W., & Gigerenzer, G. (2011). When misinformed patients try to make informed health decisions. In G. Gigerenzer & J. A. Muir Gray (Eds.), Better doctors, better patients, better decisions: Envisioning healthcare 2020 (pp. 29–43). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Neth, H. (2014). Wenn weniger mehr ist: Das Potenzial einfacher Heuristiken in Controlling und Management Reporting. In A. Klein & J. Gräf (Eds.), Reporting und Business Intelligence (2nd ed., pp. 43–57). Freiburg: Haufe Verlag.
De Cruz, H., Neth, H., & Schlimm, D. (2010). The cognitive basis of arithmetic. In B. Löwe & T. Müller (Eds.), PhiMSAMP. Philosophy of mathematics: Sociological aspects and mathematical practice (pp. 59–106). London, UK: College Publications.
Neumeyer-Gromen, A., & Gaissmaier, W. (2009). Screening programs. In M. W. Kattan (Ed.), Encyclopedia of medical decision making (Vol. 2, pp. 1020–1024). Los Angeles: Sage.
Bodemer, N., & Gaissmaier, W. (2015). Risk perception. In H. Cho, T. Reimer, & K. A. McComas (Eds.). The Sage Handbook of Risk Communication (pp. 10–23). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Bodemer, N., & Gaissmaier, W. (2012). Risk communication in health. In S. Roeser, R. Hillerbrand, P. Sandin, & M. Peterson (Eds.), Handbook of risk theory: Epistemology, decision theory, ethics, and social implications of risk (Vol. 2, pp. 621–660). Dordrecht: Springer.
Gaissmaier, W., & Gigerenzer, G. (2009). Risk communication. In M. W. Kattan (Ed.), Encyclopedia of medical decision making (Vol. 2, pp. 1006–1008). Los Angeles: Sage.
Kause, A., Prinz, R., Gaissmaier, W., & Wegwarth, O. (2014). Risikokompetenz von Ärzten und Patienten. In K. Hurrelmann & E. Baumann (Eds.), Handbuch Gesundheitskommunikation (pp. 424–439). Bern: Huber.
Gaissmaier, W., Schooler, L. J., & Gigerenzer, G. (2005). Receptive memory in judgment and decision making. In M.-L. Käsermann & A. Altorfer (Eds.), Über Lernen: Ein Gedankenaustausch (pp. 67–79). Bern: EditionSolo.
Trevena, L., Zikmund-Fisher, B., Edwards, A., Gaissmaier, W., Galesic, M., Han, P., King, J., Lawson, M., Linder, S., Lipkus, I., Ozanne, E., Peters, E., Timmermans, D., & Woloshin, S. (2012). Presenting probabilities [Chapter C]. R. Volk & H. Llewellyn-Thomas (Eds.), 2012 Update of the International Patient Decision Aids Standards (IPDAS) Collaboration's Background Document. Cardiff, CF: IPDAS Collaboration
Gigerenzer, G., & Gaissmaier, W. (2015). Intuition und Führung. In M. W. Fröse, S. Kaudela-Baum, & F. E. P. Dievernich (Eds.), Emotion und Intuition in Führung und Organisation. Heidelberg: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-658-07796-9_2
Sherbino, J., Norman, G. R., & Gaissmaier, W. (2013). In reply to Croskerry and Tait. Academic Medicine, 88, 150–151.
Mousavi, S., Meder, B., Neth, H., & Kheirandish, R. (2017). Heuristics: Fast, frugal, and smart. In Morris Altman (Ed.), Handbook of behavioral economics and smart decision-making: Rational decision-making within the bounds of reason (pp. 101–118). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Gigerenzer, G., & Gaissmaier, W. (2006). Denken und Urteilen unter Unsicherheit: Kognitive Heuristiken [Thinking and deciding under uncertainty: Cognitive heuristics]. In J. Funke (Ed.), Enzyklopädie der Psychologie: Vol. C, II, 8. Denken und Problemlösen (pp. 329-374). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
Gigerenzer, G., & Gaissmaier, W. (2015). Decision making: Nonrational theories. In J. D. Wright (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences (2nd ed., Vol. 5). Amsterdam: Elsevier. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.26017-0
Gaissmaier, W., Fific, M., & Rieskamp, J. (2011). Analyzing response times to understand decision processes. In M. Schulte-Mecklenbeck, A. Kühberger, & R. Ranyard (Eds.), A handbook of process tracing methods for decision research: A critical review and user's guide (pp. 141–162). New York: Psychology Press.