Phenomena of indecision and suspension loom large in both philosophy and psychology.  Whereas psychology discusses related phenomena in practical tasks and mostly pathological terms, philosophy strives for conceptual clarification and emphasizes the ubiquity and variety of suspension.  

In this chapter, we use fast-and-frugal trees (FFTs) as a drosophila model for developing a positive account of suspension in decision making. Being designed for handling binary classification tasks, FFTs seem particularly ill-suited for accommodating a third stance.  But by replacing one decision outcome by a do not know category or adding it as a third option, we can adapt and extend the FFT framework to explore the causes and consequences of suspension.  
 

Considering the distributions of decision outcomes and contrasting the performance of alternative models in terms of cost-benefit trade-offs illustrates the power of this methodology.  Overall, a model-based approach provides surprising insights into the functions and mechanisms of suspension and serves as a productive tool for thinking.

Resources:  10.4324/9781003474302-20  |  Download_PDF  |  Google Scholar